New Article: Waiting for justice

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article in My Republica.

“The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and Commission on Enforced Disappeared Persons (CIEDP) are dysfunctional. If new appointments are made without transparent process, these bodies will once again become the politically controlled puppets. In addition, there is an urgent need to address impunity in the security forces where their members are accused of serious crimes, including forced disappearances.”

Read the full Article here: Waiting for justice

New Article: राज्यले बिर्सिएका नागरिक

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article in Naya Patrika

” चक्रव्यूहमा परेको संक्रमणकालीन न्याय पीडित अल्मल्याउने भाँडो त बन्यो, तर वर्षौंको झुट र बेइमानीपछि आमपीडितलाई ढाँट्ने, गुमराहमा राख्ने प्रवृत्तिको पर्दाफास भएको छ । यही प्रवृत्ति हाबी रहिरहे न त संक्रमणकालीन न्याय आयोगले काम गर्न सक्छन् न त मानवअधिकार आयोगले । अन्ततः पीडितले न्याय पाउनेछैनन् ।”

Read the full Article here: राज्यले बिर्सिएका नागरिक

New Article: Costs of justice delayed

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article in My Republica.

The constitution has promised social justice and reparations for victims.  It has also granted investigatory powers to National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). But the government seems to be trying to curtail NHRC’s powers through the bill, while Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and Commission of Investigation on Enforced Disappeared Persons (CIEDP) reconstitution and appointment of officials remain in limbo

Read the full article here: Costs of justice delayed

New Article: अवसानको मुखमा संक्रमणकालीन न्याय

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article in Naya Patrika

“संक्रमणकालीन न्यायको साँचो र दिगो समाधान खोज्ने हो भने दृढ राजनीतिक इच्छा शक्तिसँगै राजनीतिक दल र राज्य खुला तथा पारदर्शी ढंगले विस्तृत परामर्शमा आउनैपर्छ । द्वन्द्वपीडित खुला संवादका लागि तयार छौँ । यी समस्या र माग सम्बोधन गर्न सामाजिक–राजनीतिक ढंगले बहस गरौँ । संक्रमणकालीन न्याय ऐन परिमार्जनको थालनी प्रस्थान बिन्दु हुन सक्छ । सबैभन्दा महत्वपूर्ण  आमपीडितको कुरा सुनौँ, समाधान यहीँ छ । “

Read the full Article here:अवसानको मुखमा संक्रमणकालीन न्याय

News Bulletin: Transitional Justice Hangs in the Balance in Nepal

60211545_2264902323553728_6526142625190248448_n

Survivors and victims of the conflict in Nepal are concerned that their hopes for justice and reparations are being undermined by a stealthy government campaign to offer amnesty for war crimes.
The government strategy, which has emerged in Kathmandu over the past week, seeks to reverse a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of Nepal in 2015 that declared an amnesty would be illegal.
Many of the Supreme Court justices have been replaced since 2015 and the government has now asked the Court to reverse the 2015 decision, even though the ruling was handed down by a special bench of three justices that has never been challenged until now. The government request will be heard by the Court on Thursday, May 16.
“If this amnesty decision is reversed, we are doomed,” said one veteran observer of Nepal’s transition process who is close to the victims. Ram Bhandari, who lost his father during the conflict and heads the Network of Families of the Disappeared (NEFAD), agreed. In a recent opinion piece he wrote: “We suffered. We were victimized and betrayed.”
The conflict was triggered in 1996 by a Maoist uprising and ended ten years later with a comprehensive peace agreement that pledged to address the needs of victims and survivors. Two commissions were set up by the government in 2014 to investigate disappearances and promote truth and reconciliation, and are due to be extended soon.
The commissions have heard from 65,000 witnesses in the last 5 years and the disappearances commission alone has collected files on 2,518 cases. In spite of this, the commissions have been boycotted by western governments, human rights advocates, and the United Nations because they were set up under the same law that called for an amnesty.
Advocates for the victims are totally opposed to an amnesty and have criticized the commissions for being bureaucratic and ineffective. But they also feel the international boycott has deprived the commissions of expertise and helped to ensure their irrelevance.
Many family members still feel that the commissions have a role to play and are worried that their voluminous database will be compromised if the government is able to control the appointment of new commissioners. NEFAD argues that the entire process for extending the commissions is flawed and needs to be revised.
One diplomat in Kathmandu who has observed the long and tortuous search for traditional justice urged human rights monitors to attend the May 16 hearing.
Another observer said that Nepal’s outspoken media, and the country’s highly praised human rights commission, will not be sufficient to protect the rights of victims if the Court decision is overturned on May 16.

New Article: Time to intervene

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article on My Republica.

“All governments in these four years prioritized their own political interests. They did not help these commissions in carrying out fair investigation on conflict-era cases. Victims experienced political betrayal and security threats.”

Read the full article here: Time to intervene

New Article: संक्रमणकालीन न्यायका चुनौती

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article in नयाँ पत्रिका.

संक्रमणकालीन न्याय सम्बन्धमा अपनाइने प्रक्रिया र सिद्धान्त दुवैले पीडितलाई संक्रमणकालीन न्याय प्रक्रियाबारे बुझ्न, कार्य गर्न तथा सहभागीका रूपमा सक्रिय हुने सवालमा अर्थपूर्ण भूमिका खेल्छन् । नेपालको सन्दर्भमा, पीडितलाई यस प्रक्रियामा कुनै भूमिका दिइएको छैन, बरु उनीहरूसँग कुनै सोधपुछसम्म नगरी तय गरिएका निर्णय स्विकार्न बाध्य बनाइएको छ ।

Read the full article here: संक्रमणकालीन न्यायका चुनौती

New Article: What next?

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article on My Republica.

There has been no signal after a month of extension in terms of act amendment and appointment of new commissioners. A suspicious play to dismantle the commissions and form a political body, not only divided victim groups but also sabotaged ongoing consultation process proposed by Ministry of Law at the end of 2018.

Read the full Article here: What next?

New Interview: Transitional justice should also address root causes of the conflict.

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD on interview by The Kathmandu Post

“A section of human rights defenders kept attacking the commissions. When the commissions were set up, they even appealed for a boycott of the process. The call for a boycott created fissures between the Kathmandu-based rights defenders and victims. We, the victims, decided to critically engage with the commissions and registered our complaints.”

Read the full Interview: Transitional justice should also address root causes of the conflict.

New Article: संक्रमणकालीन न्याय : बिचौलियाको फन्दामा

Ram Bhandari, founder of NEFAD published an article on Nagarik News.

“हाम्रो सन्दर्भमा संक्रमणकालीन न्याय प्रक्रिया कहिल्यै पनि भुइँ तहबाट उठेर गएको आधिकारिक प्रक्रिया बन्न सकेन। अहिलेको संक्रमणकालीन न्याय तथा मेलमिलाप पहलले आम समाजले खोजेको निष्पक्ष र सुरक्षित भविष्य बनाउने कुरा निश्चित गर्दैन तथा पीडितका आवश्यकता र मागलाई पनि सम्बोधन गर्न सक्दैन।”

Read the full article here: संक्रमणकालीन न्याय : बिचौलियाको फन्दामा